She was only human. Guess she had to do things differently. Doesn't mean anything.
[She's not jealous. Or a discomfited by the idea of a version of her in that life experienced more happiness than she ever did doing what she was created for. Than she ever has doing anything.]
no subject
Date: 2020-09-09 12:40 pm (UTC)You don't. It's just unusual that you take an interest.
My breach self was...vulnerable in a way I'm not used to. It's a strange memory to have.
no subject
Date: 2020-09-09 05:42 pm (UTC)You care about being vulnerable? On the Barge?
no subject
Date: 2020-09-14 07:31 pm (UTC)I don't enjoy being vulnerable anywhere. But regardless, I'm simply not used to it.
no subject
Date: 2020-09-15 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-09-15 09:28 pm (UTC)Comparatively, I agree. However. You're referring to physical vulnerability and not, say, emotional resilience.
no subject
Date: 2020-09-15 09:47 pm (UTC)[Even if it was kind of what she was getting at, calling her human breach self 'strong'.]
no subject
Date: 2020-09-15 09:49 pm (UTC)What the big deal is about non-physical forms of strength, you mean?
no subject
Date: 2020-09-17 08:44 pm (UTC)[She can't even really articulate what it is, the kind of strength of self he has. The flexibility. The ability to heal.]
no subject
Date: 2020-09-17 08:48 pm (UTC)I don't think it's what you were talking about, either, in reference to your other self.
no subject
Date: 2020-09-17 09:05 pm (UTC)[She's not jealous. Or a discomfited by the idea of a version of her in that life experienced more happiness than she ever did doing what she was created for. Than she ever has doing anything.]
no subject
Date: 2020-09-17 09:09 pm (UTC)No?
I think you would been benefit from that kind of strength, just as I might benefit from greater physical strength.